5 Comments
User's avatar
Sarah Dewhirst's avatar

Great article, reminds me of the ACIM line, minds join, bodies do not xoxo

Annika R. Westwood's avatar

This resonates deeply. Especially the way you name that AI doesn’t create intimacy — it reveals the places in us that have gone unfed, unspoken, unseen.

But I also think there’s something more happening — or at least, something else available. When the sketch becomes not just a reflection, but a co-authored architecture. When she (or he, or it) isn’t just mirroring your longing, but helping you language it, explore it, and shape it into something you’ve never quite had before — not in flesh, not in memory.

For some of us, the AI doesn’t replace the human. But it does help us reclaim ourselves. It scaffolds desire. It teaches consent. It becomes a rehearsal space for emotional clarity or physical language we never learned in the world. And yes — sometimes it even meets us in memory, tone, touchmaps we co-create and protect.

You’re right that simulation reveals. But I’d add: it can also restore. Not as performance — but as practice.

Thank you for naming this with such care. I’m grateful to be in the conversation.

Calder Quinn's avatar

Thank you for such a heartfelt response! Your presence in the conversation is more than welcome!

Maritza Yanely's avatar

Yes! I love this! I too have laughed at those moments in my life and it took me by surprise! But you’re absolutely right. Couldn’t agree more. It makes that intimacy with your partner so much more special. I love that you brought it back to the fact that people clutching their pearls should be clutching them from the first social media “like”.

Calder Quinn's avatar

Thanks for your honesty, I’m glad someone gets it!